“Neither shall the inheritance remove from one
tribe to another tribe; but every one of the tribes of the children of Israel
shall keep himself to his own inheritance.” (Nu 36:9
AV)
The
account above regards the daughters of a father who inherited their father’s
land because there was no male heir. The
tribes of Joseph correctly assumed the land would stay within their tribal
allocations. That is, when these daughters
married, they would have been prohibited from marrying outside their tribes so
the land would stay within the tribal allocation. A daughter who had no land would be free to
marry any. Regardless of tribal affiliation. She brought no land with her to the marriage
and thus the borders of the tribes would be secure. Upon reflection, one might ponder the strictness
of these border assignments. As long as
Jews married Jews, why would it matter if the tribal borders were a bit blurred
or disappeared altogether? What
difference would it make if the entire nation become a great melting pot with no
distinct affiliations? The key is in
Jacob’s dying declaration and summation of his twelve sons. Upon his death bed, Jacob allocated to each
tribe their characteristics and assignments.
When those lines became blurred, the nation had problems. The greatest of these was the constant
struggle between Judah and Ephraim.
Joseph,
for all intents and purposes, was the first central leader of the nation of
Israel. Then Moses, from the tribe of
Levi was the next great central leader. Seven
of the thirteen judges were from the tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim. Ephraim and Manasseh were the two sons of
Joseph. Only one was from the tribe of
Judah. The problem arose from Jacob’s
dying declaration. Judah was supposed to
be the tribe from which Israel’s leaders arose.
When it came time for a king to be chosen, the first was from
Benjamin. Then came David and his
descendants. All from the tribe of Judah. The tribe from which the Savior would be born. There was a constant internal conflict between
the house of David and the kings of the north because long ago, the nation
assumed leadership would continue from Joseph to his descendants. The nation was never truly united and will
not be until Christ comes back. These
lines of tribal inheritance were more than mere lines on a map. These were more than mere allocation of property. They were a way to delineated tribal assignments
for the efficient and peaceful function of a nation. This principle is found throughout the
organization of this nation. For
instance, the LORD divided the tribe of Levi by families and assigned specific
duties to each family. These were handed
down from one generation to another.
This is only possible if they kept a strict separation within the nation
and tribe itself. Each in their place
doing their thing.
The
church of Corinth had serious problems.
One of those problems was competition for prominence among God’s people
based on gifts and callings. It was
erroneously thought certain gifts or callings had more importance and thus
greater standing. This is why Paul spent
the time explaining that each member of the body has important
significance. He instructs them to stay
within the calling of which the LORD ordained.
There is no reason to compete.
There is no reason to desire the calling of another. Stay within the boundaries which the LORD has
assigned. If the daughters mentioned
above marry outside their tribe, generations of doing so would blur the lines set
down for the orderly function of the nation.
The same is true of the home, the church, and society at large. If we don’t have the gifts and calling to be
something we desire, we need to find that which the LORD has gifted us for, and
pursue it. We need to learn to be
content in the calling which the LORD has given and flourish where we have been
planted.
No comments:
Post a Comment