“11 ¶ The discretion of a man deferreth his anger; and it is his glory to pass over a transgression. 12 ¶ The king’s wrath is as the roaring of a lion; but his favour is as dew upon the grass.” (Pr 19:11-12 AV)
As is common in the book of Proverbs, two verses within close proximity
seem contradictory. However, the
contradiction is actually meant to show a balance. For instance, if it is glory for a man to pass
over a transgression, the more we pass over, the more glory we project. Therefore, to never confronting transgression
would result in maximum glory. We know
that cannot be a possibility. To do so
would mean complete anarchy. Sin would
reign unabated. This we have the next verse. The king’s wrath is part of what he does and
what he is. If the king does not act against
the transgressions of his subjects, crime and abuse would be out of
control. So, as Solomon does so often,
he gives us two sides of the same principle in the hope we see the balance
between the two. To always act in wrath
against any and all transgression shows no grace and creates a tyrant. To do just the opposite and show grace no
matter the transgression compounds the problem of sin. There has to be a balance.
One of my sons was a stubborn student.
I taught them at home for few years and I had one son who fought to
learn something he couldn’t get right off the bat. He would throw temper tantrums. He was stomp off and go to another room to
pout. He would sit at his desk with his
arms folded and face downcast in rage at the work laid before him. A parent who did not have patience and
compassion for his son might beat him betimes until he succumbed to the work
sitting before him. A parent who
experiences these episodes may take it personally. They might whip the boy until he sat and did
his work. However, in doing so, it would
only make the boy more frustrated and angrier that he wasn’t getting it. The prudent thing to do would be to show
sternness and not allow that behavior, but at the same time, spend individual
time with him to overcome the roadblock to learning that was there. This same headstrong child committed an absolute
no-no in my house. It was one of those
things where there were no second chances.
I am not a man of rage. Normally
speaking. But this incident was not a
light thing. For the first time, this
child experienced the wrath of authority.
Passing over a transgression and wrath are the two opposites of
reaction to transgression. Most of our
reactions are somewhere in the middle. The
balance can be found in what one hopes to accomplish. Paul encourages us to correct our children in
such a way they are not enticed to wrath themselves. In other words, if our reaction to their sin
produces the same emotion which we are exhibiting, it probably was no the right
way to handle it. If, on the other hand,
our grace or wrath produces repentance and reconciliation, it was the right way
to handle it. God has given us the
responsibility to raise young ones who are complex. Some principles apply to cover any personality
or situation. It is not always black and
white. Each child is different. Each temperament is different. What works for one does not always work for
another. The overall principles are the
same, but the way in which it is accomplished differs. The wisdom is to know what to pass over a transgression
and when to deal with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment