“Restore, I pray you, to them, even this day, their lands, their vineyards, their oliveyards, and their houses, also the hundredth part of the money, and of the corn, the wine, and the oil, that ye exact of them. Then said they, We will restore them, and will require nothing of them; so will we do as thou sayest. Then I called the priests, and took an oath of them, that they should do according to this promise. …And the people did according to this promise.” (Ne 5:11-13 AV)
For a better understanding of this passage, we can bring to memory the condition of the people of God at the time. A remnant had returned several decades earlier to rebuild the temple after Babylon had destroyed it. Sixty-six years after the rebuilding of the temple, Nehemiah returns to rebuild the walls around Jerusalem. In those sixty-six years, the returning remnant got into some bad habits. One of them was to give out loans with interest to their fellow Jews. This was strictly forbidden in the Mosaic law. The poor of the land found themselves hopelessly in debt and unable to live because of the burdensome terms of the loans which they took out. The wealthy took their lands and vineyards as collateral, removing the ability for the poor to earn income in order to pay back the loan. When Nehemiah found out, he required the wealthy return the collateral so the poor could pay back the loans interest-free. On the face of it, we would think this to be the right thing to do and no recognition should be made for the obedience of the wealthy. However, one must remember they made terms of a loan with the understanding of making a profit. By returning to biblical standards, adding to this inflation, the wealthy would actually lose money. We might say, “So what! They shouldn’t have made the loan, to begin with.” True enough. But they still reverted to a biblical standard even though it cost them.
What
parent hasn’t had to settle a dispute over two siblings when a shared toy is at
stake? This squabble is as common as encroachment
of personal space. Imagine two siblings
playing nicely. There are more toys to
choose from than Sundays in the year.
They are playing nicely until one of the siblings notices the other having
a great time with a certain toy. It is fascinating
to watch the wheels of envy turning in that little head. He watches.
He becomes envious. Then he
plots. The younger they are, the far
less subtle they are in gaining what they want.
They plot and plan. Waiting for
the time when attention is slightly drawn away, that little envious monster
grabs the toy and proclaims his sibling was done with it and not he gets to
play with it. A brawl ensues. The older they get, they learn to use negotiating
tactics like pretending the lame toy he is stuck with far more fun than the toy
his sibling has. A few glances and a trade
is made. However, the victim discovers
how lame of a toy he traded for and a brawl ensues. Then there is the argument of who had it
first. This starts out with a timeline
going back a few minutes. Then days. Then weeks, months, and years. When the argument gets to the point of who
was born first, then a brawl ensues. At
this point, the grown-up, in the wisdom of Solomon, requires the aggressor to return
the toy. This grown-up can do one of two
things. He can either require the
exchange and that would be the end of it, or he could thank the aggressor for
complying with the ethical choice. The
later is what we want to notice here.
Nehemiah
was frustrated from time to time with the people whom he led. They were not behaving as the Bible instructed
them to. Nehemiah was frustrated because
the people had quickly forgotten how the LORD dealt with their past
disobedience and was concerned the LORD may undo all the grace that was
presently enjoyed. In other words, they
should have not better. This is not the
first time Nehemiah would come down on his people. There are coming three other situations
wherein the people of God flagrantly disobeyed the word of God and put in jeopardy
the work of God. Each time, Nehemiah
required they comply with the word of God.
But herein is the lesson. Even if
the people knew better, it is right to recognize obedience. Even if they were stubbornly disobedient, it
is a good thing to appreciate compliance.
Even if someone deliberately ignored the law and did wrong, if they made
it right, a thank you might be in order.
There is no harm in recognizing obedience whether it was immediate, or
after the fact. Regardless, if a person
complies with the law, there are times when he should be recognized for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment